Smoking cessation and risk of metabolic syndrome: A meta-analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Smoking is an important risk factor for various metabolic and cardiovascular disorders, and smoking cessation reduces the risk of these conditions. However, weight gain is commonly observed when individuals quit smoking, which often leads to hesitation in pursuing smoking cessation. Weight gain increases the risk of metabolic syndrome (MS). However, previous studies that investigated the relationship between smoking cessation and MS have yielded inconsistent results. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the association between smoking cessation and MS. METHODS: Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and CINAHL databases, were comprehensively searched from inception to April 2023, to identify relevant studies examining the relationship between smoking cessation and MS, comparing such relationship to that with active smoking. The methodological quality of the selected studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. A random-effects model was used for meta-analysis. RESULTS: Of 495 identified studies, 24 were reviewed. The risk of selection bias was identified in all the studies. The overall analysis of 14 studies, including data of combined results for both men and women, revealed an increased risk of MS among ex-smokers compared with that among active smokers (pooled relative risk [RR] 1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08-1.29). From the selected studies, 13 studies analyzing men were extracted for subgroup analysis. Among men, no significant difference in the risk of developing MS was observed between ex-smokers and smokers (pooled RR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.95-1.17). In men, the risk of MS increased if the cessation period was ≤15 years in men (pooled RR 1.26, 95% CI: 1.01-1.56) and slightly decreased if the cessation period was > 15 years (RR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.70-1.00) in ex-smokers compared with that in current smokers. CONCLUSION: An increased risk of MS was observed in the early stages of smoking cessation compared with current smoking. As the longer duration of smoking cessation, the risk of MS becomes less significant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".