MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399206083 · doi:10.1016/j.coisb.2024.100519

ODE-based models of signaling networks in autophagy

2024· article· en· W4399206083 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Markus Galhuber, Kathrin Thedieck

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Opinion in Systems Biology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutophagy in Disease and Therapy
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftAustrian Science FundEuropean CommissionHORIZON EUROPE Framework ProgrammeMinistère de l'Économie, de la Science et de l'Innovation - Québec
KeywordsOdeAutophagyComputer scienceBiologyMathematicsGeneticsApplied mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aberrant metabolism and nutrient processing are hallmarks in cancer. Autophagy is a catabolic process, clearing macromolecules and providing metabolite intermediates for anabolism. Autophagy safeguards healthy cells from tumorigenesis while mobilizing metabolites promoting tumor growth. Autophagy is controlled by the mTOR signaling network in conjunction with AMPK and ULK1. This kinase triad features highly intertwined feedback and feedforward mechanisms, complicating predictions on nutrient and drug response. ODE-based models offer a deterministic approach frequently used for the exploration of signaling dynamics. Recent ODE models of the mTOR-AMPK-ULK1 network revealed non-linear behaviors, bistable switches, and oscillatory patterns, shedding light on the robustness and adaptability of autophagy control. We highlight emerging perspectives on AMPK in mTORC1-ULK1 crosstalk and mechanisms for integration into future models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Opinion in Systems BiologySame topicAutophagy in Disease and TherapyFrench-language works237,207