MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399208096 · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2024.112115

Generative AI in Software Engineering Must Be Human-Centered: The Copenhagen Manifesto

2024· article· en· W4399208096 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel Russo, Sebastian Baltes, Niels van Berkel, Paris Avgeriou, Fabio Calefato, Beatriz Cabrero‐Daniel, Gemma Catolino, Jürgen Cito, Neil Ernst, Thomas Fritz, Hideaki Hata, Reid Holmes, Maliheh Izadi, Foutse Khomh, Mikkel Baun Kjærgaard, Grischa Liebel, Alberto Lluch Lafuente, Stefano Lambiase, Walid Maalej, Gail C. Murphy, Nils Brede Moe, Gabrielle O'Brien, Elda Paja, Mauro Pezzè, John Stouby Persson, Rafael Prikladnicki, Paul Ralph, Martin P. Robillard, Thiago Rocha Silva, Klaas-Jan Stol, Margaret‐Anne Storey, Viktoria Stray, Paolo Tell, Christoph Treude, Bogdan Vasilescu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Systems and Software · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEthics and Social Impacts of AI
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Victoria
FundersCarlsbergfondetAalborg UniversitetAlfred P. Sloan Foundation
KeywordsManifestoGenerative grammarSoftware engineeringComputer scienceSoftwareEngineeringArtificial intelligenceProgramming languagePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.029
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.097

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.029
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.037
Scholarly communication0.0120.011
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0080.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Systems and SoftwareSame topicEthics and Social Impacts of AIFrench-language works237,207