A thalamic perspective of (un)consciousness in pharmacological and pathological states in humans
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary Currently, there is substantial ongoing discussion around the functional role of the thalamus in consciousness. What is missing in the literature, however, is a systematic investigation of the relevance of specific thalamic nuclei in pharmacologically and pathologically altered states of consciousness in humans. Using functional neuroimaging in both healthy anaesthetised volunteers and patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC), we sought to identify which specific thalamic subregions in both cohorts may be differentially significant for loss of consciousness. Our findings revealed that the pulvinar (Pu) and ventral-latero-ventral (VLV) nuclei, in anaesthesia, and the VLV, in DOC, had distinct functional connectivity patterns related to the default mode and somatomotor networks. Remarkably, among all nuclei, the Pu was found to have the strongest functional connectivity change with anaesthetic-induced loss of consciousness, while in DOC patients, we found the VLV revealed the strongest connectivity change in comparison with healthy controls. Furthermore, we provide evidence that this neural connectivity biomarker in patients also mirrors the changes observed at the behavioural level, which could have clinical implications for targeted deep brain stimulation in therapy for DOC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".