Effective Connectivity of Default Mode Network Subsystems in Parkinson’s Disease with Mild Cognitive Impairment Based on Spectral Dynamic Causal Modeling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study is to compare the differences in effective connectivity within the default mode network (DMN) subsystems between patients with Parkinson’s disease with mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI) and patients with Parkinson’s disease with normal cognition (PD-CN). The mechanisms underlying DMN dysfunction in PD-MCI patients and its association with clinical cognitive function in PD-MCI are aimed to be investigated. Methods: The spectral dynamic causal model (spDCM) was employed to analyze the effective connectivity of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data in the resting state for the DMN subsystems, which include the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC), posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), left and right angular gyrus (LAG, RAG) in 23 PD-MCI and 22 PD-CN patients, respectively. The effective connectivity values of DMN subsystems in the two groups were statistically analyzed using a two-sample t-test. The Spearman correlation analysis was used to test the correlation between the effective connectivity values of the subsystems with significant differences between the two groups and the clinical cognitive function (as measured by Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA) score). Results: Statistical analysis revealed significant differences in the effective connections of MPFC-LAG and LAG-PCC between the two patient groups (MPFC-LAG: t = –2.993, p < 0.05; LAG-PCC: t = 2.174, p < 0.05). Conclusions: The study findings suggest that abnormal strength and direction of effective connections between DMN subsystems are found in PD-MCI patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".