Robust digital-twin airspace discretization and trajectory optimization for autonomous unmanned aerial vehicles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The infiltration of heterogenous fleets of autonomous Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) in smart cities is leading to the consumerization of city air space which includes infrastructure creation of roads, traffic design, capacity estimation, and trajectory optimization. This study proposes a novel autonomous Advanced Aerial Mobility (AAM) logistical system for high density city centers. First, we propose a real-time 3D geospatial mining framework for LiDAR data to create a dynamically updated digital twin model. This enables the identification of viable airspace volumes in densely populated 3D environments based on the airspace policy/regulations. Second, we propose a robust city airspace dynamic 4D discretization method (Skyroutes) for autonomous UAVs to incorporate the underlying real-time constraints coupled with externalities, legal, and optimal UAV operation based on kinematics. An hourly trip generation model was applied to create 1138 trips in two scenarios comparing the cartesian discretization to our proposed algorithm. The results show that the AAM enables a precise airspace capacity/cost estimation, due to its detailed 3D generation capabilities. The AAM increased the airspace capacity by up to 10%, the generated UAV trajectories are 50% more energy efficient, and significantly safer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".