Visible/near-infrared hyperspectral imaging combined with machine learning for identification of ten Dalbergia species
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: species, which are threatened by illegal logging. Effective identification methods are crucial for ecological conservation, biodiversity preservation, and the regulation of the timber trade. Methods: We integrate Visible/Near-Infrared (Vis/NIR) Hyperspectral Imaging (HSI) with advanced machine learning techniques to enhance the precision and efficiency of wood species identification. Our methodology employs various modeling approaches, including Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN). These models analyze spectral data across Vis (383-982 nm), NIR (982-2386 nm), and full spectral ranges (383 nm to 2386 nm). We also assess the impact of preprocessing techniques such as Standard Normal Variate (SNV), Savitzky-Golay (SG) smoothing, normalization, and Multiplicative Scatter Correction (MSC) on model performance. Results: With optimal preprocessing, both SVM and CNN models achieve 100% accuracy across NIR and full spectral ranges. The selection of an appropriate wavelength range is critical; utilizing the full spectrum captures a broader array of the wood's chemical and physical properties, significantly enhancing model accuracy and predictive power. Discussion: These findings underscore the effectiveness of Vis/NIR HSI in wood species identification. They also highlight the importance of precise wavelength selection and preprocessing techniques to maximize both accuracy and cost-efficiency. This research contributes substantially to ecological conservation and the regulation of the timber trade by providing a reliable, non-destructive method for identifying threatened wood species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".