A set of nematode rRNA cistron databases and a primer assessment tool to enable more flexible and comprehensive metabarcoding
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ITS-2-rRNA has been particularly useful for nematode metabarcoding. but does not resolve all phylogenetic relationships and reference sequences are not available for many nematode species. This is a particular issue when metabarcoding complex communities such as wildlife parasites or terrestrial and aquatic free-living nematode communities. We have used markerDB to produce four databases of distinct regions of the rRNA cistron; the 18S rRNA gene, the 28S rRNA gene, the ITS-1 intergenic spacer and the region spanning ITS-1_5.8S_ITS-2. These databases comprise 2645, 254, 13461, and 10107 unique full-length sequences representing 1391, 204, 1837, and 1322 nematode species, respectively. The comparative analysis illustrates the complementary value but also reveals a better representation of Clade III, IV, and V than Clade I and Clade II nematodes in each case. Although the ITS-1 database includes the largest number of unique full-length sequences, the 18S rRNA database provides the widest taxonomic coverage. We also developed, PrimerTC; a tool to assess primer sequence conservation across any reference sequence database and have applied it to evaluate a large number of previously published rRNA cistron primers. We identified sets of primers that currently provide the broadest taxonomic coverage for each rRNA marker across the nematode phylum. These new resources will facilitate more comprehensive metabarcoding of nematode communities using either short-read or long-read sequencing platforms. Further, PrimerTC is available as a simple WebApp to guide or assess PCR primer design for any genetic marker and/or taxonomic group beyond the nematode phylum.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".