MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399260676 · doi:10.4000/11r9d

De la capture à l’asservissement : Comment la machine Meta remodèle les pratiques des journalistes francophones

2023· article· fr· W4399260676 on OpenAlexaffabout
Samuel LAMOUREUX, Jean-Hugues Roy

Bibliographic record

VenueTic & société · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersUniversity of Pennsylvania
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article examine la relation entre l’application Facebook, de Meta Platforms Inc., et les journalistes francophones sous la loupe de l’hypothèse techno-féodale de Durand (2020) qui affirme que les grandes plateformes socionumériques établissent des rapports de prédation avec les médias d’information. Une analyse computationnelle des publications sur des pages Facebook administrées en Belgique, au Canada, en France et en Suisse nous permet d’étayer la capture infrastructurelle des médias opérée par Meta. Elle est suivie d’une analyse qualitative qui confirme que Meta remodèle les pratiques journalistiques et crée des nouvelles dynamiques d’extraction de la valeur.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.698
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.231
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.140 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTic & sociétéSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207