MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399266390 · doi:10.25236/ajhss.2024.070511

A Healing Journey of Anne from Trauma in Anne of Green Gables

2024· article· en· W4399266390 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAcademic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFolklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtPsychoanalysisArt historyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As a prolific writer in Canada, Montgomery has created more than twenty novels among which her first novel Anne of Green Gables is the most popular one. The heroine of the novel is an orphaned girl named Anne Shirley with freckles and red hair. The novel narrates Anne’s upbringing from the age of eleven to seventeen. Anne had led a miserable life before coming to Green Gables, which made her traumatized. Thus, this essay arranges from the perspective of trauma theory to analyse Anne’s course of life. According to the usual logic of trauma theory, this essay begins with Anne’s traumatic symptoms, and then finds out what factors related to Anne’s trauma. The final part is also the key of the essay which dissects Anne’s healing process from her trauma. On the one hand, applying trauma theory into Anne’s growing experiences can open a new view for readers to reevaluate Anne. On the other hand, readers can get some illumination through Anne’s experiences and arouse their awareness to get rid of their trauma in the daily lives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.119

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0320.022
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0040.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAcademic Journal of Humanities & Social SciencesSame topicFolklore, Mythology, and Literature StudiesFrench-language works237,207