IF IT STAINS BLACK IT IS NOT HENNA ! A RARE CASE OF ALLERGIC CONTACT DERMATITIS TO PURE HENNA (Lawsonia inermis, alba ).
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We know that Allergic Contact Dermatitis is extremely rare to pure Henna application all overthe world, but incidence of allergy to temporary tattoo is increasing in North America secondary to presence of pphenylenediamine (PPD) in Temporary Black Tattoo.OBJECTIVE: This case report documents a rare case of Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Pure Henna in Canada.METHOD AND RESULT: We present a case of Allergic Contact Dermatitis (ACD) to pure henna in an Asiangirl in Canada who had her first possible exposure to pure henna six years ago in India.Her second exposure occurred in Alberta when she used a Henna paste contained in a plastic cone bought locally from a store.She developed vesiculo-bullous eruption at the site of application. A diagnosis of ACD was made. She was treated with potent topical steroid for two weeks.Patch testing was done with PPD and Henna paste after six weeks of cooling period.CONCLUSION: This is one first case of ACD to Pure Henna ( Lawsonia Inermis, alba ) in Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it