LC-SRM combined with machine learning enables fast identification and quantification of bacterial pathogens in urinary tract infections
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are a worldwide health problem. Fast and accurate detection of bacterial infection is essential to provide appropriate antibiotherapy to patients and to avoid the emergence of drug-resistant pathogens. While the gold standard requires 24h to 48h of bacteria culture prior MALDI-TOF species identification, we propose a culture-free workflow, enabling a bacterial identification and quantification in less than 4 hours using 1mL of urine. After a rapid and automatable sample preparation, a signature of 82 bacterial peptides, defined by machine learning, was monitored in LC-MS, to distinguish the 15 species causing 84% of the UTIs. The combination of the sensitivity of the SRM mode on a triple quadrupole TSQ Altis instrument and the robustness of capillary flow enabled us to analyze up to 75 samples per day, with 99.2% accuracy on bacterial inoculations of healthy urines. We have also shown our method can be used to quantify the spread of the infection, from 8×10 4 to 3×10 7 CFU/mL. Finally, the workflow was validated on 45 inoculated urines and on 84 UTI-positive urine from patients, with respectively 93.3% and 87.1% of agreement with the culture-MALDI procedure at a level above 1×10 5 CFU/mL corresponding to an infection requiring antibiotherapy. HIGHLIGHTS – LC-MS-SRM and machine learning to identify and quantify bacterial species of UTI – Fast sample preparation without bacterial culture and high-throughput MS analysis – Accurate quantification through calibration curves for 15 species of UTIs – Validation on inoculations (93% accuracy) and on patients specimens (87% accuracy)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".