MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399276403 · doi:10.1093/gji/ggae186

Including geological orientation information into geophysical inversions with unstructured tetrahedral meshes

2024· article· en· W4399276403 on OpenAlexafffund
Mitra Kangazian, Colin G. Farquharson

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Journal International · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersMemorial University of Newfoundland
KeywordsGeologyOrientation (vector space)GeophysicsTetrahedronPolygon meshGeometryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY Minimum-structure, or Occam’s style of, inversion introduces a regularization function into the underdetermined geophysical inverse problems to stabilize the inverse problem and mitigate its non-uniqueness. The regularization function is typically designed such that it can incorporate a priori information into the inversion framework, thus constructing models that have more plausible representations of the true Earth’s subsurface structure. One type of a priori information is geological orientation information such as strike, dip and tilt angles of the subsurface structure. This type of information can be incorporated into inverse problems through the roughness operators. Designing such roughness operators for inversion frameworks using unstructured tetrahedral meshes is not as straightforward as for inversion frameworks using structured meshes due to the arbitrary and complex geometry of unstructured meshes. Researchers have developed methods which allow us to incorporate geological orientation information into inversion frameworks with unstructured tetrahedral meshes. The majority of these methods consider each cell in a package with its neighbours, hence, the constructed models are not as sharp as desired if the regularization function is measured using an $\ell _1$-type measure instead of the $\ell _2$ norm. To address this issue, we propose a method that calculates the directional derivatives of physical property differences between two adjacent cells normalized by the distance between the cell centroids. This approach is able to both incorporate geological orientation information into the inversion framework and construct models with sharp boundaries for the scenarios in which the regularization term is quantified by an $\ell _1$-type measure. This method is an integral-based approach, therefore, the roughness operators are scaled appropriately by the cell volumes, which is an important characteristic for the inversions with unstructured meshes. To assess the performance and the capability of the proposed method, it was applied to 3-D synthetic gravity and magnetotelluric examples. The gravity example was also used to investigate the impact of applying the depth weighting function inside and outside the roughness operators for the scenarios that the model objective function is measured by an $\ell _1$ norm. The examples show that the proposed method is able to construct models with a reasonable representation of the strike and dip directions of the true subsurface model with sharper boundaries if the regularization function is quantified by an $\ell _1$-type measure. The examples also demonstrate the proposed method behaves numerically well, and has a fast convergence rate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Journal InternationalSame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207