MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

E-Wirus: Strategi Peningkatan Ekonomi Keluarga Penyandang Disabilitas Kota Bogor

2024· article· id· W4399276599 on OpenAlexaff
Khopipah Assonda Assonda, Nur Islamiah, Tin Herawati, Nia Ramdaniah

Bibliographic record

VenuePolicy Brief Pertanian Kelautan dan Biosains Tropika · 2024
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLocal Governance and Development
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Keluarga penyandang disabilitas adalah salah satu kelompok yang rentan terhadap kemiskinan di Indonesia karena menghadapi berbagai hambatan, dintaranya: hambatan sosial, ekonomi, termasuk akses terhadap pekerjaan dan informasi. Keterbatasan keterampilan bantu diri pada anak penyandang disabilitas dapat menghambat kemampuan orang tua untuk bekerja. Selain itu, anak penyandang disabilitas memiliki kebutuhan yang lebih banyak daripada anak lain pada umumnya, misalnya kebutuhan pengobatan, terapi, alat bantu, dan kebutuhan khusus lainnya. Hasil analisis situasi yang dilakukan di YPD Kota Bogor menunjukkan bahwa mayoritas keluarga dengan anak penyandang disabilitas mengalami kesulitan ekonomi. Tekanan ekonomi subjektif yang dirasakan oleh keluarga dengan anak penyandang disabilitas mengganggu pemenuhan kebutuhan keluarga. Dengan kata lain, kesejahteraan ekonomi keluarga tersebut belum tercapai. Jika tidak ditangani, dapat berdampak buruk pada kesejahteraan masyarakat secara keseluruhan dan meningkatkan angka kemiskinan. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan program pemberdayaan, guna meningkatkan perekonomian keluarga dengan anak penyandang disabilitas. Salah satu upaya yang dapat dilakukan adalah melalui kegiatan wirausaha. Program E-Wirus (Wirausaha Digital) diusulkan untuk memperkuat ekonomi keluarga penyandang disabilitas melalui wirausaha digital, sehingga dapat membantu meningkatkan perekonomian keluarga, dengan tetap memenuhi kebutuhan anak penyandang disabilitas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.118

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolicy Brief Pertanian Kelautan dan Biosains TropikaSame topicLocal Governance and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207