MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399279823 · doi:10.61259/kt.144999

Psykososiaalisen intervention adaptointi - kuvaus keskeisistä näkökulmista ja käsitteistä

2024· article· fi· W4399279823 on OpenAlexaff
Noora Seilo, Lars Lindholm, S. Tani, Taina Laajasalo, Riikka Lämsä, Johanna Cresswell-Smith, Petra Kouvonen, Outi Mantere

Bibliographic record

VenueKasvun tuki -aikakauslehti · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefi
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicResearch in Social Sciences
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Interventioiden sopivuutta kontekstiin eli kohderyhmälle, käyttäjille ja käyttöympäristöönvoidaan arvioida ja vertailla. Intervention adaptointi eli suunnitelmallinen muokkaus on keino parantaa käyttöönoton jajuurtumisen edellytyksiä. Katsauksessa kartoitetaan psykososiaalisten interventioiden arviointiin ja adaptointiin liittyvääkeskeistä sanastoa. Katsauksessa kuvataan ensimmäistä kertaa suomen kielellä psykososiaalisen interventionkontekstiin sopivuuden arvioinnin ja adaptoinnin toteutus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.357 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKasvun tuki -aikakauslehtiSame topicResearch in Social SciencesFrench-language works237,207