Entre escritas e críticas: intelectualidade e história da literatura na obra de O. G. Rego de Carvalho
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study comprises the (re)construction of the history of Piau literature, based on the intellectual work of Orlando Geraldo de Carvalho (1930Carvalho ( -2013)), problematizing issues of borders and identities of "being Piau".It debates the interrelations between the local, the regional and the national as demarcators of literary canons and which generated rifts with other intellectuals, especially at the local level.Methodologically, the study carried out an analytical-interpretive reading of the documents, composed of the book Como e por que me faz Escritor (1994), his novels, as well as anthologies and critical fortunes on the writer's work.As a theoretical-methodological framework, propositions were used to think about the "literary field" and canonical and identity dimensions, biography and autobiography.The study considered, in general terms, that the performance and work of the literary man are central to (re)thinking the debates about the history of Piau literature and literary criticism, through the dynamic elements of (auto)biographical writing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".