Analysis of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-Assisted Cellular Vehicle-to-Everything Communication Using Markovian Game in a Federated Learning Environment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper studies a game theory model to ensure fairness and improve the communication efficiency in an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-assisted cellular vehicle-to-everything (C-V2X) communication network using Markovian game theory in a federated learning (FL) environment. The UAV and each vehicle in a cluster utilized a strategy-based mechanism to maximize their model completion and transmission probability. We modeled a two-stage zero sum Markovian game with incomplete information to jointly study the utility maximization of the participating vehicles and the UAV in the FL environment. We modeled the aggregating process at the UAV as a mixed strategy game between the UAV and each vehicle. By employing Nash equilibrium, the UAV determined the probability of sufficient updates received from each vehicle. We analyzed and proposed decision-making strategies for several representative interactions involving gross data offloading and federated learning. When multiple vehicles enter a parameter transmission conflict, various strategy combinations are evaluated to decide which vehicles transmit their data to the UAV. The optimal payoff in a transmission window is derived using the Karush–Khun–Tucker (KKT) optimality conditions. We also studied the variation in optimal model parameter transmission probability, average packet delay, UAV transmit power, and the UAV–Vehicle optimal communication probabilities under different conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".