Convolutional neural network based methodology for flexible phase prediction of high entropy alloys
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The advent of high entropy alloys has created a design space that is unfeasible to explore solely through experimentation, thus necessitating the use of computational methods, such as artificial neural networks. This study proposes a new architecture utilizing a convolutional layer to extract relevant elemental features from the alloy composition without limiting the model to specific elements by treating the elemental composition of the high entropy alloy in a similar manner to a row of pixels, using relevant elemental properties in lieu of color values. This convolutional model was able to predict the crystal structure of solid solutions in a high entropy alloy composition with an accuracy of 89.3% in a six-way classification and the formation of intermetallics with an accuracy of 91.4% during holdout validation, while being capable of accurately predicting the primary crystal structure of high entropy alloys containing elements the model was not trained on. Significant space still exists for further experimentation and improvement with this methodology, including augmenting the available datasets and implementation of additional convolutional layers. Due to the limited interpretability of the model architecture, care should be taken when inferring trends from the model prior to validation through experimental, or well-established computational methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".