A Proposed Hybrid Machine Learning Model Based on Feature Selection Technique for Tidal Power Forecasting and Its Integration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Renewable energy resources are playing a crucial role in minimizing fossil fuel emissions. Integrating machine learning techniques with tidal power forecasting could greatly enhance the accuracy and reliability of predictions, which is crucial for efficient energy production and management. A hybrid approach combining different methods often yields better results than relying on individual techniques. The accuracy of tidal current power is very important, especially for smart grid applications. This work proposes hybrid adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) with the Kalman filter (KF) and a neuro-wavelet (WNN) for tidal current speed, direction, and power forecasting. The turbine used in this study is driven by a direct drive permanent magnet synchronous generator (DDPMSG). The predictions of individual and hybrid models including the ANFIS, the Kalman filter, and the WNN for tidal current speed and the power it generates are compared with another dataset as a way of validation which is the tidal currents direction. Also, other published work results in the literature are compared to the proposed work. Different hybrid models are proposed for smart grid integration. The results of this work indicate that the hybrid model of the WNN and the ANFIS for tidal current power or speed forecasting has the highest performance compared to all other models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".