MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399298955 · doi:10.1017/s0967199424000170

A rare case of intra-ovarian oocyte maturation

2024· article· en· W4399298955 on OpenAlexaff
Sara Jobson, Jean‐François Hamel, Annie Mercier

Bibliographic record

VenueZygote · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicEchinoderm biology and ecology
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGerminal vesicleMeiosisOocyteGameteOvulationOvaryBiologyAndrologyProphasePolar bodyGametogenesisZoologyAnatomyEmbryoCell biologyEmbryogenesisMedicineEndocrinologyPregnancyHuman fertilizationGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary The intra-ovarian presence of ootids, i.e. female gametes that have completed meiosis, is considered exceptional in the animal kingdom. The present study explores the first such case to be reported in a sea cucumber (Echinodermata: Holothuroidea). In the overwhelming majority of animals, including holothuroids, oocytes (i.e. immature female gametes) that are developing in the ovary undergo a primary arrest at the prophase stage of meiosis, which may last from days to decades. In free-spawning taxa, this arrest is normally lifted only during or shortly before transit in the gonoduct, when gamete release (spawning) is imminent. However, oocytes of the holothuroid Chiridota laevis were discovered to have resumed the second meiotic division including the completion of germinal vesicle breakdown and polar-body expulsion inside the ovary, effectively reaching the ootid stage concomitantly with ovulation (i.e. escape from follicle cells) prior to spawning. The potential drivers and significance of this exceptionally rare case of full intra-ovarian oogenic maturation are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZygoteSame topicEchinoderm biology and ecologyFrench-language works237,207