Time-domain diffuse optical imaging technique for monitoring rheumatoid arthritis disease activity: theoretical development and in silico validation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Objective. Effective early treatment—within 3–5 months of disease onset—significantly improves rheumatoid arthritis (RA) prognosis. Nevertheless, 1 in 3 patients experiences treatment failure which takes 3–6 months to detect with current monitoring techniques. The aim of this work is to develop a method for extracting quantitative features from data obtained with time-domain diffuse optical imaging (TD-DOI), and demonstrate their sensitivity to RA disease activity. Approach. 80 virtual phantoms of the proximal interphalangeal joint—obtained from a realistic tissue distribution derived from magnetic resonance imaging—were created to simulate RA-induced alterations in 5 physiological parameters. TD-DOI images were generated using Monte Carlo simulations, and Poisson noise was added to each image. Subsequently, each image was convolved with an instrument response function (IRF) to mimic experimental measurements. Various spatiotemporal features were extracted from the images (i.e. statistical moments, temporal Fourier components), corrected for IRF effects, and correlated with the disease index (DI) of each phantom. Main results. Spatiotemporal Fourier components of TD-DOI images were highly correlated with DI despite the confounding effects of noise and the IRF. Moreover, lower temporal frequency components ( ⩽ 0.4 GHz) demonstrated greater sensitivity to small changes in disease activity than previously published spatial features extracted from the same images. Significance. Spatiotemporal components of TD-DOI images may be more sensitive to small changes in RA disease activity than previously reported DOI features. TD-DOI may enable earlier detection of RA treatment failure, which would reduce the time needed to identify treatment failure and improve patient prognosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".