Architecture Design and Optimization of Large-scale Data Processing Systems in Cloud Computing Environments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the rapid development of cloud computing technology, large-scale data processing systems are facing unprecedented challenges and opportunities. This paper delves into the key technologies and strategies for constructing and optimizing large-scale data processing systems in a cloud computing environment. Firstly, the paper analyzes the characteristics of the cloud computing environment and its intrinsic connection with big data processing, clarifying the system design requirements. Subsequently, a comprehensive architecture design scheme is proposed, which combines distributed computing frameworks, efficient data storage and management strategies, and optimized network architectures. In terms of system optimization, the paper starts from four dimensions: performance, cost, scalability, and security, and proposes a series of targeted optimization measures, including resource scheduling optimization, cost-benefit analysis, modular design, and data security strategies. Through case analysis, the effectiveness of the proposed architecture design and optimization strategies has been validated. The research results of this paper not only provide theoretical guidance for large-scale data processing systems in cloud computing environments but also offer valuable references for practical applications in related fields.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".