MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399319167 · doi:10.7765/9781526175342.00006

Acknowledgements

2024· book-chapter· en· W4399319167 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueManchester University Press eBooks · 2024
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEarly Modern Women Writers
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of the Fraser ValleyGeorge Washington University
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We are delighted to acknowledge those who have helped us to bring this book to completion.Women in Exile in Early Modern Europe and the Americas began at brunch in the autumn of 2019.As friends and former colleagues, we were happy to discover mutual research interests on the topic.Energized by the possibility of a new collaboration, we went about drafting our 'dream team' of scholars whose important work on early mod-

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.053
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.365
Threshold uncertainty score0.906

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.053
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3650.250

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.148 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueManchester University Press eBooksSame topicEarly Modern Women WritersFrench-language works237,207