Synthesis and Characterization of Click Chemical Probes for Single-Cell Resolution Detection of Epichaperomes in Neurodegenerative Disorders
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD), represent debilitating conditions with complex, poorly understood pathologies. Epichaperomes, pathologic protein assemblies nucleated on key chaperones, have emerged as critical players in the molecular dysfunction underlying these disorders. In this study, we introduce the synthesis and characterization of clickable epichaperome probes, PU-TCO, positive control, and PU-NTCO, negative control. Through comprehensive in vitro assays and cell-based investigations, we establish the specificity of the PU-TCO probe for epichaperomes. Furthermore, we demonstrate the efficacy of PU-TCO in detecting epichaperomes in brain tissue with a cellular resolution, underscoring its potential as a valuable tool for dissecting single-cell responses in neurodegenerative diseases. This clickable probe is therefore poised to address a critical need in the field, offering unprecedented precision and versatility in studying epichaperomes and opening avenues for novel insights into their role in disease pathology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".