MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Comprehensive Overview of Bottom-Up Proteomics Using Mass Spectrometry

2024· review· en· W4399330665 on OpenAlexaff
Yuming Jiang, Dina Schuster, Benjamin A. Neely, Germán L. Rosano, Norbert Volkmar, Amanda Momenzadeh, Trenton M. Peters-Clarke, Susan Egbert, Simion Kreimer, Emma H. Doud, Oliver M. Crook, Amit Kumar Yadav, Muralidharan Vanuopadath, Adrian D. Hegeman, Martín L. Mayta, Anna G. Duboff, Nicholas M. Riley, Robert L. Moritz, Jesse G. Meyer

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Measurement Science Au · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Institute of Standards and TechnologyIsrael Institute for Biological ResearchIndian Council of Medical ResearchNational Institutes of HealthNational Science FoundationAgencia Nacional de Promoción de la Investigación, el Desarrollo Tecnológico y la InnovaciónNational Institute on AgingTranslational Health Science and Technology Institute
KeywordsMass spectrometryProteomicsTop-down proteomicsChemistryComputer scienceChromatographyProtein mass spectrometryTandem mass spectrometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Proteomics is the large scale study of protein structure and function from biological systems through protein identification and quantification. "Shotgun proteomics" or "bottom-up proteomics" is the prevailing strategy, in which proteins are hydrolyzed into peptides that are analyzed by mass spectrometry. Proteomics studies can be applied to diverse studies ranging from simple protein identification to studies of proteoforms, protein-protein interactions, protein structural alterations, absolute and relative protein quantification, post-translational modifications, and protein stability. To enable this range of different experiments, there are diverse strategies for proteome analysis. The nuances of how proteomic workflows differ may be challenging to understand for new practitioners. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of different proteomics methods. We cover from biochemistry basics and protein extraction to biological interpretation and orthogonal validation. We expect this Review will serve as a handbook for researchers who are new to the field of bottom-up proteomics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.755
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.237
GPT teacher head0.414
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations161
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Measurement Science AuSame topicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207