MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399337349 · doi:10.1086/728362

Spenser in Turkey: For a Syllabus of Errors

2024· article· en· W4399337349 on OpenAlex
Ethan John Guagliardo, Firdevs Idil Kurtulan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSpenser Studies A Renaissance Poetry Annual · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRousseau and Enlightenment Thought
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSyllabusMathematicsMathematics educationPsychologyNatural language processingComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article examines the state of Spenser studies in Turkey. The task is challenging, because his works have never been translated into Turkish. He is, in short, largely absent. We first contextualize this absence by attending to the Turkish reception of allegory, a genre tainted by post-Romantic biases and associations with the Ottoman past, which modern Turkey has long defined itself against. As a result, allegory in Turkey has paradoxically been read too allegorically, as exemplifying a dead and oppressively theological era. We then identify impediments to a Spenserian readership downstream from this, including the nature of Turkish pedagogy and the reluctance of Turkish scholars and students to identify positively with the Ottoman past. By identifying such blockages, we hope to foster a richer engagement with Spenser in Turkey, as well as new comparative work on Ottoman and Spenserian allegory, particularly in light of the latter’s involvement in anti-Ottoman racialization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.385
Threshold uncertainty score0.879

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it