MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399337810 · doi:10.61737/cfrt3613

État de la situation sur les impacts sociétaux de l'intelligence artificielle et du numérique - 2024

2024· report· fr· W4399337810 on OpenAlexaff
Lyse Langlois, Martin Cousineau, Marie-Pierre Gagnon, Chris Isaac Larnder, Nadia Naffi, Julie Garneau, Christian Lévesque, Colette Brin, Véronique Guèvremont, Christophe Abrassart, Stéphane Roche, Vincent Gautrais, Anne-Sophie Hulin, Allison Marchildon, Bryn Williams–Jones, Marianne Ozkan, Alexandre Castonguay, Aude Motulsky, Maxime Sasseville, Viviane Vallerand, Otilia Holgado, Normand Roy, Nathalie Glais, Bruno Poëllhuber, Ann-Louise Davidson, Valéry Psyché, Janvier Jn Ngnoulaye, Christian Desîlets, Laurence Lachapelle-Bégin, Arnold Magdelaine, Elaine Mosconi, Julie Voisin, Didier Paquelin, Isabelle Roberge‐Maltais, Benoît Payette, Charlotte Tessier, Johanne Chanca, Florent Begue, Alexandre Gourret, William Auclair, Antoine Boudreau LeBlanc, Gabrielle Verreault, Félix-Arnaud Morin Bertrand

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEthics and Social Impacts of AI
Canadian institutionsUniversité TÉLUQConcordia UniversityUniversité LavalUniversité de MontréalUniversité de SherbrookeJohn Abbott College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L'État de la situation sur les impacts sociétaux de l'intelligence artificielle et du numérique fait état des connaissances actuelles sur les impacts sociétaux de l'IA et du numérique, structurées autour des sept axes de recherche de l'Obvia : santé, éducation, travail et emploi, éthique et gouvernance, droit, arts et médias, et transition socio-écologique. Hypertrucages, désinformation, empreinte environnementale, droit d'auteur, évolution des conditions de travail… Le document recense les grandes questions de recherche soulevées par le déploiement progressif de ces nouvelles technologies, auxquelles viennent s'ajouter des cas d'usages et de pistes d'action. Il s'impose ainsi comme un outil complet et indispensable pour accompagner la prise de décision dans tous les secteurs bouleversés par ces changements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.219
Threshold uncertainty score0.436

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEthics and Social Impacts of AIFrench-language works237,207