Optimized automated testing: test case generation and maintenance using latent semantic analysis-based TextRank and particle swarm optimization algorithms
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Software development would have to include automated testing to ensure the finished product and performs as intended. However, the process of Test Case Generation and Maintenance can be time-consuming and error-prone, especially when manual methods are used. This research proposes a new approach to improve the efficiency and accuracy of automated testing using latent semantic analysis (LSA)-based TextRank (TR) and particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithms. The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of these algorithms in generating and optimizing test cases based on requirements analysis. To retrieve key information from the criteria, methods including text classification (TC), named entity recognition (NER), and sentiment analysis (SA) are used to evaluate the text. Test cases are then generated using LSA-based TR for text summarization and PSO for optimization. The aim of this work is to identify any limitations that need to be addressed and to evaluate the overall efficiency and accuracy of automated testing (AT) using proposed algorithms. The results of this research are expected to have important implications for the software industry, helps to improve the overall efficiency and accuracy of AT. The findings could guide future research that led to the creation of more advanced and effective tools for AT.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it