Efficient and Privacy-Preserving Weighted Range Set Sampling in Cloud
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Weighted set sampling has been proven essential for generating discrete numbers based on their weights and found broad applications in recommendation systems. The extension of this method, known as weighted range set sampling (WRSS), specifies a query range and applies weighted set sampling to the data within that range. With the proliferation of cloud computing, outsourcing encrypted data and data processing tasks to cloud servers has become a common practice to overcome data storage and processing challenges while protecting data privacy. Existing studies have proposed many privacy-preserving solutions for various customized query and data processing tasks, none have specifically addressed privacy-preserving WRSS. In response to this gap, our paper introduces an efficient and privacy-preserving WRSS scheme. We begin by leveraging the three-party secret sharing (TPSS) scheme as a foundation to design an enhanced three-party secret sharing (eTPSS) scheme with superior storage and computational efficiency. Building upon the eTPSS scheme, we introduce a series of private algorithms to safeguard WRSS privacy. Our scheme integrates the use of a binary search tree and the alias method for WRSS, ensuring privacy through eTPSS-based private algorithms. A thorough security analysis under the simulation-based real/ideal worlds model showcases the effectiveness of our proposed scheme. The proposed scheme's efficiency has been substantiated through extensive experiments, demonstrating that our scheme marks a significant advancement in addressing the challenges posed by privacy-preserving WRSS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".