MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399342702 · doi:10.1109/lcsys.2024.3409369

An Approach to Data-Based Linear Quadratic Optimal Control

2024· article· en· W4399342702 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Control Systems Letters · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicControl Systems and Identification
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersAustralian Research Council
KeywordsOptimal controlQuadratic equationContext (archaeology)TrajectoryCovarianceMathematicsMathematical optimizationLinear-quadratic-Gaussian controlControl theory (sociology)Noise (video)Linear-quadratic regulatorComputer scienceApplied mathematicsControl (management)StatisticsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This letter presents a data-based approach to linear quadratic optimal control design. The system manipulated variable is assumed to have a zero mean uncertainty with a certain covariance, and the true system trajectory is measurable subject to measurement noise. The separation principle in the data-based context is investigated, which reveals that the original problem can be decomposed into an optimal quadratic control problem and an interval-wise trajectory estimation problem that can be designed separately. Algorithms are developed for both the finite and infinite horizon control problem, with the latter proven to be able to asymptotically stabilize the expected value of all trajectories in the controlled behavior. An illustrative example is provided to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.965
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it