MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4399347094 · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082312

Long-term exposure to ambient fine particulate matter (PM <sub>2.5</sub> ) and attributable pulmonary tuberculosis notifications in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, China: a health impact assessment

2024· article· en· W4399347094 on OpenAlexaff
Igor Popović, Ricardo J. Soares Magalhães, Shukun Yang, Yurong Yang, Bo‐Yi Yang, Guang‐Hui Dong, Xiaolin Wei, Joe Van Buskirk, Gregory J. Fox, Erjia Ge, Guy B. Marks, Luke D. Knibbs

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Open · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsPublic Health OntarioUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaWashington University in St. LouisNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMedicineParticulatesTuberculosisEnvironmental healthDemographyAttributable riskPopulationPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Long-term exposure to fine particulate matter (≤2.5 µm (PM 2.5 )) has been associated with pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) notifications or incidence in recent publications. Studies quantifying the relative contribution of long-term PM 2.5 on TB notifications have not been documented. We sought to perform a health impact assessment to estimate the PM 2.5 - attributable TB notifications during 2007–2017 in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region (NHAR), China. Methods PM 2.5 attributable TB notifications were estimated at township level (n=358), stratified by age group and summed across NHAR. PM 2.5 -associated TB-notifications were estimated for total and anthropogenic PM 2.5 mass and expressed as population attributable fractions (PAFs). The main analysis used effect and uncertainty estimates from our previous study in NHAR, defining a counterfactual of the lowest annual PM 2.5 (30 µg/m 3 ) level, above which we assumed excess TB notifications. Sensitivity analyses included counterfactuals based on the 5th (31 µg/m 3 ) and 25th percentiles (38 µg/m 3 ), and substituting effect estimates from a recent meta-analysis. We estimated the influence of PM 2.5 concentrations, population growth and baseline TB-notification rates on PM 2.5 attributable TB notifications. Results Over 2007–2017, annual PM 2.5 had an estimated average PAF of 31.2% (95% CI 22.4% to 38.7%) of TB notifications while the anthropogenic PAF was 12.2% (95% CI 9.2% to 14.5%). With 31 and 38 µg/m 3 as counterfactuals, the PAFs were 29.2% (95% CI 20.9% to 36.3%) and 15.4% (95% CI 10.9% to 19.6%), respectively. PAF estimates under other assumptions ranged between 6.5% (95% CI 2.9% to 9.6%) and 13.7% (95% CI 6.2% to 19.9%) for total PM 2.5 , and 2.6% (95% CI 1.2% to 3.8%) to 5.8% (95% CI 2.7% to 8.2%) for anthropogenic PM 2.5 . Relative to 2007, overall changes in PM 2.5 attributable TB notifications were due to reduced TB-notification rates (−23.8%), followed by decreasing PM2.5 (−6.2%), and population growth (+4.9%). Conclusion We have demonstrated how the potential impact of historical or hypothetical air pollution reduction scenarios on TB notifications can be estimated, using public domain, PM 2.5 and population data. The method may be transferrable to other settings where comparable TB-notification data are available.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score0.147

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.007
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ Open→Same topicAir Quality and Health Impacts→French-language works237,207→