MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399347218 · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ad416c

Downstream natural gas composition across U.S. and Canada: implications for indoor methane leaks and hazardous air pollutant exposures

2024· article· en· W4399347218 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sebastian T. Rowland, Eric D. Lebel, Jackson S W Goldman, Jeremy K. Domen, Kelsey R. Bilsback, Angélica Ruiz, Jessie M. Jaeger, Lee Ann L. Hill, Yannai Kashtan, Colin Finnegan, Metta Nicholson, Robert B. Jackson, Seth B.C. Shonkoff, Drew R. Michanowicz

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Research Letters · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEnergy FoundationHeinz Endowments
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceDownstream (manufacturing)Hazardous wasteMethaneNatural gasPollutantMethane emissionsAir pollutantsWaste managementEnvironmental engineeringEnvironmental chemistryAir pollutionChemistryBusinessEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Previous research has shown that natural gas (NG) leaks from residential appliances are common, affecting greenhouse gas emission inventories and indoor air quality. To study these implications, we collected and analyzed 587 unburned NG samples from 481 residences over 17 North American cities for hydrocarbons, hazardous air pollutants, and organosulfur odorants. Nearly all (97% of) gas samples contained benzene (between-city mean: 2335 ppbv [95% CI: 2104, 2607]) with substantial variability between cities. Vancouver, Los Angeles, Calgary, and Denver had at least 2x higher mean benzene concentrations than other cities sampled, with Vancouver exhibiting a nearly 50x greater mean benzene level than the lowest-concentration city (Boston). We estimate that current U.S. and Canadian emissions inventories are missing an additional 25 000 [95% CI: 19 000, 34 000] and 4000 [95% CI: 3700, 5200] lbs benzene yr −1 through downstream NG leakage, respectively. Concentrations of odorants added for leak detection varied substantially across cities, indicating a lack of standardization. Houston, for instance, had 5x higher mean tert-butyl mercaptan levels than Toronto. Using these odorant measurements, we found that methane emissions as high as 0.0080–0.28 g h −1 and indoor benzene enhancements 0.0096–0.11 ppbv could go undetected by persons with an average sense of smell, with large uncertainties driven by smelling sensitivity, gas composition, and household conditions. We also observed larger leaks (>10 ppm ambient methane) in ∼4% of surveyed homes, confirming that indoor leakage occurs at varying degrees despite the presence of odorants. Overall, our results illustrate the importance of downstream NG composition to understand potential emissions, exposures, and odor-mediated leak detection levels. Given methane’s global warming potency, benzene’s toxicity, and wide variation in smelling abilities, our findings highlight the deficiencies regarding the sole reliance on odorization to alert and protect all occupants from indoor leaks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.800
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Research LettersSame topicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas DynamicsFrench-language works237,207