Bibliographic record
Abstract
Available on the latest research progress of clean energy and power generation technology, this paper volume gathers a bunch of papers collected from 2023 8th International Conference on Clean Energy and Power Generation Technology (CEPGT 2023), held via virtual form in Zhuhai, China during December 15th to 17th, 2023. The Conference was attended by about 100 delegates around the globe. In the opening ceremony speech, all academicians, experts and scholars were welcomed to attend the Conference and to share insightful speeches and presentations. Then in the keynote speech part, Prof. Marc A. Rosen (Ontario Tech University, Canada), Prof. Haiping Yang (Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China), Prof. Qinmin Yang (Zhejiang University, China), Prof. Qiang Lu (North China Electric Power University, China) and other professors made wonderful academic reports on international frontier hot spots. Apart from the keynote speeches, oral and poster presentation parts were also held and displayed by various scholars, leading to a warm atmosphere of academic discussion. We received a number of submissions from the Conference. After rigorous review and review rebuttal process by related top experts, various excellent papers were accepted and included in this paper volume. These papers cover many topics of the Conference theme, including Energy Security and Clean Use, Energy Conservation and Emission Reduction, Biomass Energy Engineering, Hydroelectric Power Generation, Solar Photovoltaic Power Generation System, etc. The works of this volume can promote the development of clean energy and power generation technology, and thereby enhance scientific information interchange among scholars from top universities, research centers and high-tech enterprises working all around the world. Featuring the most cutting-edge research directions and achievements related to clean energy and power generation technology, this Conference provided the most comprehensive research in related fields and a more comprehensive understanding of the latest results of cross researches in the fields. Meanwhile, it also helped researchers and engineers understand the research frontier, as well as discover the solutions to potential problems. We would like to acknowledge the authors for their contributions and the reviewers for their time to review the submissions. We are thankful to all the committee members and advisors of this volume. Finally, our appreciation also goes to the editors and members of Journal of Physics: Conference Series for their efforts in publishing this volume. We hope that it will serve as a reference for researchers and practitioners in academia and industry in the areas related to clean energy and power generation technology. The Committee of CEPGT 2023 List of Committee Member is available in this pdf.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.737 | 0.566 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".