MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399356088

Lemag' - La revue numérique de la Fondation de l’Université de Guyane Edition n°12 - Décembre 2023: DOSSIER : L'héritage africain dans la culture guyanaiseRECHERCHE : La transition alimentaire en GuyaneTECHNIQUE : Cartographie 3D du littoral guyanaisENTRETIEN : Ouahcène Nait-Rabah, Chef du Département Génie civil et Construction Durable

2023· other· fr· W4399356088 on OpenAlexaff
Gaëlle Fornet, Suzanne Pons, Julie Ronzon, Sophie Vo, Guillaume Brunier, Laurent Linguet, Charles Dossou Ligan, Jean Moomou, Natali Fabiana Da Costa E Silva, Damien Davy, Michael Rapinsky

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2023
Typeother
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Identity, and Health
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En application de la réglementation en vigueur, vous disposez d'un droit d'accès, de rectification ou d'effacement, de limitation du traitement de vos données, d'un droit d'opposition, d'un droit à la portabilité de vos données ainsi que du droit de définir des directives relatives au sort de vos données après votre décès qui s'exercent par courrier électronique à cette adresse : dpo@univ-guyane.frVous disposez enfin du droit d'introduire une réclamation auprès de la Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés (CNIL), autorité de contrôle du respect des obligations en matière de données de la fondation universitaire, cliquez ici.Si vous souhaitez vous désinscrire, veuillez cliquer ici.Les opinions exprimées dans la revue numérique Lemag' n'engagent que les auteurs 3

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.230
Threshold uncertainty score0.457

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0610.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)Same topicMigration, Identity, and HealthFrench-language works237,207