MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399356521 · doi:10.18535/ijsrm/v12i06.c03

Nanotechnology Applications in Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR)

2024· article· en· W4399356521 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Syed Masroor Hassan Rizvi

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Scientific Research and Management (IJSRM) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnhanced oil recoveryNanotechnologyMaterials sciencePetroleum engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) techniques are crucial for maximizing crude oil extraction from reservoirs, especially when traditional methods leave significant amounts of oil untapped. Recent advancements in nanotechnology have introduced innovative solutions to longstanding challenges in the oil industry. This research paper explores the application of nanotechnology in EOR, emphasizing the unique properties of nanoparticles that make them highly effective in this context. Nanoparticles, defined by their nanometer-scale dimensions, exhibit high surface area to volume ratios, quantum effects, and enhanced reactivity. These properties enable various mechanisms in EOR, including improved wettability, reduction in interfacial tension, enhanced thermal stability, selective plugging and fluid diversion, and catalytic effects. The study details how silica and titanium dioxide nanoparticles can modify rock surface properties, leading to better water imbibition and oil displacement. It also discusses how surfactant-coated nanoparticles can reduce the interfacial tension between oil and water, facilitating easier oil flow. Furthermore, the research highlights the role of metal oxide nanoparticles, such as aluminum oxide and zinc oxide, in enhancing thermal conductivity and stability during thermal EOR methods like steam flooding. The ability of polymer-coated nanoparticles to selectively plug high-permeability zones and redirect injection fluids is examined, demonstrating how this can lead to a more uniform sweep and higher oil recovery. The catalytic properties of certain nanoparticles, such as iron oxide, are also explored for their potential to promote in-situ chemical reactions that generate gases aiding oil displacement. Field applications and case studies underscore the practical benefits of nanotechnology in EOR. Examples include the use of silica nanoparticles in Middle Eastern oil fields, polymer-coated nanoparticles in Canadian heavy oil reservoirs, and iron oxide nanoparticles in Indian oil fields. These case studies have shown significant increases in oil recovery rates and operational efficiencies. However, the research also identifies several challenges that must be addressed for the widespread adoption of nanotechnology in EOR. These include the high costs and scalability issues associated with nanoparticle production and deployment, potential environmental and health risks, and the need for customized solutions to cater to the unique conditions of different reservoirs. In conclusion, while nanotechnology presents promising advancements in EOR through various mechanisms, overcoming challenges related to cost, scalability, and environmental impact is crucial. As research progresses, nanotechnology is poised to play a vital role in enhancing oil recovery and meeting global energy demands.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.865
Threshold uncertainty score0.467

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Scientific Research and Management (IJSRM)Same topicEnhanced Oil Recovery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207