MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399359305 · doi:10.5489/cuaj.8834

Poster Session 9: Oncology – Kidney, Other

2024· article· en· W4399359305 on OpenAlex
Editor CUAJ

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Urological Association Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrobial Inactivation Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNephrectomyRenal cell carcinomaSurgeryRenal functionCreatinineBiopsyRadiologyUrologyKidneyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a novel, non-thermal ablation procedure used for treating small renal masses (SMR), such as renal cell carcinomas (RCC).This prospective case series explores IRE's effectiveness and six-year outcomes in patients with difficult-to-treat RCC.We report tumor-free survival (TFS) and document complications and renal function changes.Methods: IRE was offered to patients with a biopsy-confirmed RCC in a solitary kidney, von Hippel Lindau syndrome, or a difficult-to-treat RCC that was deemed amenable only to radical nephrectomy for tumor control.Followup protocol at three, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 months post-IRE included creatinine, eGFR, and gadolinium-enhanced MRI to monitor for residual or recurrent disease.Results: Twenty-seven biopsy-proven RCC were treated in 27 patients.The median followup time was 42 months (range 3-72).Post-IRE, six patients experienced immediate adverse events (AE): four transient hematuria (Clavien-Dindo grade [CD] 1), one hematoma requiring transfusion (CD 2), and one PE (CD 2).One patient received a ureteral stent for a delayed ureteral stricture (CD 3a).At three months, residual tumors were found in five patients, making a treatment success rate of 81.5%.Four patients were managed with salvage thermal ablation (three microwave [MWA], one radiofrequency) and one patient underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy (LN).Four patients with recurrent RCC (mean time of 21 months) were managed with surveillance, MWA, and LN.No patient developed metastasis.The six-year TFS rate was 79.3%, with no deaths due to RCC.The average eGFR decline at 12 and 72 months was nine and 6.3 mL/min/1.73m2, respectively.Conclusions: This study demonstrates that patients with difficult-to-treat RCCs can be treated with IRE safely and effectively.Immediate AE were limited to CD 2 and fully resolved.The procedure success rate and the six-year TFS rate suggest that IRE is a feasible option for patients with complex SRM.Larger and longer studies are needed to evaluate long-term oncologic and functional outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.419
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it