MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399361088 · doi:10.37798/2024732502

Regression Learner Application Model-Based Short-Term Load Forecasting for Mascouche (Quebec, Canada)

2024· article· en· W4399361088 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mouctar Tchakala, Tahar Tafticht, Iqbal Messaïf, Md Jahidur Rahman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Energy - Energija · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrological Forecasting Using AI
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerm (time)Computer scienceRegression analysisEconometricsRegressionStatisticsArtificial intelligenceMachine learningMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Load forecasting is crucial for power systems optimal operation and allows power utilities to overcome technical and economic issues. Some forecasting techniques are currently being deployed on a large scale to meet the requirements of increased energy demand while balancing it with the production to achieve socio-economic benefits for sustainable development. In this paper, we are diving into the forecasting using the regression method. We are focusing on short-term load forecasting and how it can give businesses valuable insights into future sales, labor needs, and more. Power utilities use short-term load forecasting technology to make reasonable power systems. A forecasting model with low prediction errors helps reduce operating costs and risks for the operators leading to models’ optimization. To make things real, we are using actual load and weather data from the Hydro-Quebec database. We will be exploring the capabilities, advantages, and limitations of this method, all while keeping an eye on the changing landscape of electricity supply and demand. Our study is centered around the Mascouche region in Quebec, Canada, where the load fluctuates between 60 to 140 megawatts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Energy - EnergijaSame topicHydrological Forecasting Using AIFrench-language works237,207