MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399362331 · doi:10.1007/s41114-024-00049-6

Theoretical and experimental constraints for the equation of state of dense and hot matter

2024· article· en· W4399362331 on OpenAlexafffund
Rajesh Kumar, Verônica Dexheimer, Johannès Jahan, Jorge Noronha, Jacquelyn Noronha-Hostler, Claudia Ratti, Nicolás Yunes, Angel Rodrigo Nava Acuna, Mark Alford, Mahmudul Hasan Anik, Debarati Chatterjee, Katerina Chatziioannou, Hsin-Yu Chen, Alexander Clevinger, C.A.N. Conde, Nikolas Cruz-Camacho, Travis Dore, C. Drischler, Hannah Elfner, R. C. Essick, David A. Friedenberg, Suprovo Ghosh, Joaquin Grefa, Roland Haas, Alexander Haber, Jan Hammelmann, Steven P. Harris, C.‐J. Haster, Tetsuo Hatsuda, Maurício Hippert, Renan Hirayama, Jeremy W. Holt, Micheal Kahangirwe, Jamie M. Karthein, Toru Kojo, Philippe Landry, Zidu Lin, Matthew Luzum, T. Andrew Manning, Jordi Salinas, M. Coleman Miller, Elias R. Most, Débora Mroczek, Azwinndini Muronga, Nicolas Patino, J. B. Peterson, Christopher Plumberg, Damien R. P. Price, Constança Providência, Rômulo Rougemont, S. Roy, Hitansh Shah, Stuart L. Shapiro, Andrew W. Steiner, Michael Strickland, Hung Tan, Hajime Togashi, Israel Portillo, Pengsheng Wen, Ziyuan Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueLiving Reviews in Relativity · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicHigh-Energy Particle Collisions Research
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversity of TorontoPerimeter Institute
FundersNuclear PhysicsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDipartimento di Scienze, Università degli Studi Roma TreOffice of ScienceInstitute for Advanced StudyNuclear Safety and Security CommissionUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignConsejo Nacional de Innovación, Ciencia y TecnologíaConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloU.S. Department of EnergyPrinceton UniversityNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y TecnologíaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsNeutron starDense matterNuclear matterCollisionHeavy ionEffective field theoryEquation of stateQuantum chromodynamicsTheoretical physicsQCD matterLattice QCDParticle physicsStatistical physicsPerturbative QCDLattice (music)Lattice field theoryNuclear physicsQuark–gluon plasmaIonNucleonQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This review aims at providing an extensive discussion of modern constraints relevant for dense and hot strongly interacting matter. It includes theoretical first-principle results from lattice and perturbative QCD, as well as chiral effective field theory results. From the experimental side, it includes heavy-ion collision and low-energy nuclear physics results, as well as observations from neutron stars and their mergers. The validity of different constraints, concerning specific conditions and ranges of applicability, is also provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations77
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLiving Reviews in RelativitySame topicHigh-Energy Particle Collisions ResearchFrench-language works237,207