Identification of Reaction Network Hypotheses for Complex Feedstocks from Spectroscopic Measurements with Minimal Human Intervention
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work, we detail an automated reaction network hypothesis generation protocol for processes involving complex feedstocks where information about the species and reactions involved is unknown. Our methodology is process agnostic and can be utilized in any reactive process with spectroscopic measurements that provide information on the evolution of the components in the mixture. We decompose the mixture spectra to obtain spectroscopic signatures of the individual components and use a 1-D convolutional neural network to automatically identify functional groups indicated by them. We employ atom-atom mapping to automatically recover reaction rules that are applied on candidate molecules identified from chemistry databases through fingerprint similarity. The method is tested on synthetic data and on spectroscopic measurements of lab-scale batch hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) of biomass to determine the accuracy of prediction across datasets of varying complexities. Our methodology is able to identify reaction network hypotheses containing reaction networks close to the ground truth in the case of synthetic data, and we are also able to recover candidate molecules and reaction networks close to the ones reported in the previous literature studies for biomass pyrolysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".