MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399365056 · doi:10.1145/3630106.3659046

Drivers and persuasive strategies to influence user intention to learn about manipulative design

2024· article· en· W4399365056 on OpenAlexafffund
Pooria Babaei, Julita Vassileva

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversitas Brawijaya
KeywordsExploitComputer scienceCognitionSocial mediaPsychologyNatural experimentApplied psychologyChannel (broadcasting)Social influenceInternet privacySocial psychologyComputer securityWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The proliferation of e-commerce, game, and social networking sites, has brought to light the use of "dark patterns" or, more generally, manipulative designs (MDs), which exploit psychological effects and cognitive biases of users to channel their behavior toward outcomes that benefit the company or owner of the site, against the users’ best interests. Previous research has categorized MDs, assessed their impact on users, gauged their prevalence, and attempted automated detection using computer vision and natural language processing techniques. However, limited attention has been given to understanding how to warn and educate users about MDs, guiding them to recognize and resist such manipulative tactics. To address this gap, we carried out a controlled study with n=134 participants, using a survey based on the Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) to better understand the motivations of people to learn about MDs. We also explored the effectiveness of two persuasive strategies, based on Cialdini’s principles of influence (social influence and authority), to trigger attention towards MDs and intention to learn more about MDs and to avoid them. For this, we created a simulated application in a mobile app distribution platform modeled like Google Play Store containing a visual signal, a warning based on one of the two strategies, and simulated reviews from other users. The results indicate that two of the five PMT constructs - a higher Perceived Severity of MDs and a lower Perceived Response Cost of learning about MDs - have the most significant influence on the Intention to learn more about MDs. The participants in the experimental group, exposed to the two persuasive strategies exhibited a larger increase in their intention to seek information about MDs than the participants in the control group. Our study showcases the potential of a persuasive intervention, illustrating how mobile app distribution platforms can enhance user protection against MD exploitation. By implementing such interventions, these platforms can boost accountability and transparency of applications existing on their platform, and MD awareness among their users.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.582
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPrivacy, Security, and Data ProtectionFrench-language works237,207