MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399366923 · doi:10.58931/cibdt.2024.2122

The Rising Burden Of Inflammatory Bowel Disease In Canada

2024· article· en· W4399366923 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian IBD Today · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of CalgarySickKids Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInflammatory bowel diseaseMedicineInflammatory Bowel DiseasesIntensive care medicineDiseaseGastroenterologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Impact of Inflammatory Bowel Disease report, produced by the Canadian Gastro-Intestinal Epidemiology Consortium (cangiec.ca) for Crohn’s and Colitis Canada is a serial policy report produced every 3–5 years that summarizes the existing literature on the epidemiology, burden, and impact of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in Canada and identifies knowledge gaps. Its goal is to inform people living with IBD and their caregivers, donors, physicians, researchers, policy makers, and other stakeholders about the current burden of IBD in Canada. It plays an integral role for Crohn’s and Colitis Canada’s advocacy efforts. In addition, the report informs the research funding policy of the health charity, which is the second largest non-governmental funder of IBD research in the world. The latest iteration of this report was released on June 1, 2023 and is available here. This article summarizes the current epidemiology of IBD in Canada and discusses its implications for clinical care in 2024 and beyond.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.255
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it