Bibliographic record
Abstract
Other| June 01 2024 Shift Work: The Hospital in Histories of Architecture and Medicine Annmarie Adams Annmarie Adams McGill University Annmarie Adams studies the cultural landscapes of homes and hospitals. She is a fellow of the Royal Architectural Institute of Canada, the Canadian Academy of Health Sciences, and the Society of Architectural Historians. She currently serves as president of the Canadian Society for the History of Medicine. Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians (2024) 83 (2): 134–147. https://doi.org/10.1525/jsah.2024.83.2.134 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Annmarie Adams; Shift Work: The Hospital in Histories of Architecture and Medicine. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 1 June 2024; 83 (2): 134–147. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/jsah.2024.83.2.134 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentJournal of the Society of Architectural Historians Search Where do medicine and architecture intersect?1 I think about this question every day, especially during the past seven years or so as I have been teaching both medical and architecture students. A favorite image shows architect Eberhard Zeidler and physician-administrator John Evans admiring the model for the revolutionary McMaster University Health Sciences Centre, which opened in 1972 and arguably put Canada on the international hospital design map (Figure 1). The Zeidler–Evans relationship represents a key moment when the two professions worked together productively on a building and the collaboration resulted in a truly revolutionary project, as hospitals go.2 The two fields have distinct approaches to historical research. Medical historians tend to see architecture as an illustration of medical progress, while architectural historians engage the built environment as evidence of medical change (and sometimes nonchange).3 Examples remind us how often medical history books feature images of buildings,... You do not currently have access to this content.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".