MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399368134 · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2024.110187

The COMPASS complex maintains the metastatic capacity imparted by a subpopulation of cells in UPS

2024· article· en· W4399368134 on OpenAlexaff
Ga I Ban, Vijitha Puviindran, Xiang Yu, Puvi Nadesan, Jackie Tang, Jianhong Ou, Nicholas Guardino, Makoto Nakagawa, MaKenna R. Browne, A. F. Wallace, Koji Ishikawa, Eijiro Shimada, John T. Martin, Yarui Diao, David G. Kirsch, Benjamin A. Alman

Bibliographic record

VenueiScience · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
FundersNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin DiseasesNational Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsCompassChemistryNanotechnologyBiophysicsBiologyPhysicsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intratumoral heterogeneity is common in cancer, particularly in sarcomas like undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS), where individual cells demonstrate a high degree of cytogenic diversity. Previous studies showed that a small subset of cells within UPS, known as the metastatic clone (MC), as responsible for metastasis. Using a CRISPR-based genomic screen in-vivo , we identified the COMPASS complex member Setd1a as a key regulator maintaining the metastatic phenotype of the MC in murine UPS. Depletion of Setd1a inhibited metastasis development in the MC. Transcriptome and chromatin sequencing revealed COMPASS complex target genes in UPS, such as Cxcl10 , downregulated in the MC. Deleting Cxcl10 in non-MC cells increased their metastatic potential. Treating mice with human UPS xenografts with a COMPASS complex inhibitor suppressed metastasis without affecting tumor growth in the primary tumor. Our data identified an epigenetic program in a subpopulation of sarcoma cells that maintains metastatic potential.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.249
Threshold uncertainty score0.147

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueiScienceSame topicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamicsFrench-language works237,207