Change of Scenery: Unsupervised LiDAR Change Detection for Mobile Robots
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a fully unsupervised deep change detection approach for mobile robots with 3D LiDAR. In unstructured environments, it is infeasible to define a closed set of semantic classes. Instead, semantic segmentation is reformulated as binary change detection. We develop a neural network, RangeNetCD, that uses an existing point-cloud map and a live LiDAR scan to detect scene changes with respect to the map. Using a novel loss function, existing point-cloud semantic segmentation networks can be trained to perform change detection without any labels or assumptions about local semantics. The mean intersection over union (mIoU) score is used for quantitative comparison. RangeNetCD outperforms the baseline by 3.8% to 7.7% depending on the amount of environmental structure. The neural network operates at 67.1 Hz and is integrated into a robotâs autonomy stack to allow safe navigation around obstacles that intersect the planned path. In addition, a novel method for the rapid automated acquisition of per-point ground-truth labels is described. Covering changed parts of the scene with retroreflective materials and applying a threshold filter to the intensity channel of the LiDAR allows for quantitative evaluation of the change detector.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".