LaserSAM: Zero-Shot Change Detection Using Visual Segmentation of Spinning LiDAR
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents an approach for applying camera perception techniques to spinning LiDAR data. To improve the robustness of long-term change detection from a 3D LiDAR, range and intensity information are rendered into virtual perspectives using a pinhole camera model. Hue-saturation-value image encoding is used to colourize the images by range and near-IR intensity. The LiDAR’s active scene illumination makes it invariant to ambient brightness, which enables night-to-day change detection without additional processing. Using the range-colourized, perspective image allows existing foundation models to detect semantic regions. Specifically, the Segment Anything Model detects semantically similar regions in both a previously acquired map and live view from a path-repeating robot. By comparing the masks in both views, changes in the live scan are detected. Results indicate that the Segment Anything Model accurately captures the shape of arbitrary changes introduced into scenes. The proposed method achieves a segmentation intersection over union of 73.3% when evaluated in unstructured environments and 80.4% when evaluated within the planning corridor. Changes can be detected reliably through day-to-night illumination variations. After pixel-level masks are generated, the one-to-one correspondence with 3D points means that the 2D masks can be used directly to recover the 3D location of the changes. The detected 3D changes are avoided in a closed loop by treating them as obstacles in a local motion planner. Experiments on an unmanned ground vehicle demonstrate the performance of the method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".