Effet des pratiques ressources humaines efficaces sur la satisfaction au travail : le rôle de l’engagement au travail et de l’identification organisationnelle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
S’appuyant sur le modèle AMO (Ability, Motivation, Opportunity) et la Théorie de l’identité sociale, cette étude vise à mieux saisir les mécanismes et conditions d’influence de la relation entre les pratiques ressources humaines (RH) efficaces et la satisfaction au travail. Basée sur les réponses offertes par 201 employés qui ont rempli un sondage électronique durant la pandémie de COVID-19, cette étude apporte trois contributions. Premièrement, elle relève l’effet positif des pratiques RH efficaces sur les niveaux d’engagement et de satisfaction des employés. Deuxièmement, elle souligne le rôle médiateur de l’engagement dans la relation unissant les pratiques RH efficaces à la satisfaction au travail. Troisièmement, elle montre le rôle modérateur de l’identification organisationnelle sur cette première relation. Les implications de ces résultats sont discutées en guise de conclusion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".