Cosmographic analysis of the dynamics of universe in higher dimensional compactified space with Tachyonic field
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work, the considered model is contained in higher dimensional compactified space in the form of M4 × M6, where M6 is compact inner space. Since, for a higher dimensional cosmological model, Tachyon matter is an automatic and fantastic choice, we have supposed that the scalar field is driven by Tachyon together with the higher dimensional cosmological constant [Formula: see text]. Our observation is that the theory provides a good solution for the cosmological scale factor of the present universe. Here, it is important that the forms of the tachyonic field ϕ and potential V are simple trigonometric hyperbolic functions. We study the cosmographical parameters like equation of state parameter, statefinder parameters, jerk, snap, and lerk parameters. The graphical representations of cosmological parameters show the overall evolution of the universe under a tachyonic field in a higher dimensional model. The classical stability of the model due to small perturbations both for dark energy and metric are examined by the study of the square speed of sound and by the linear perturbation method. We also analyzed the model in ω−ω′ and r− s cosmological plane.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".