StripeRust-Pocket: A Mobile-Based Deep Learning Application for Efficient Disease Severity Assessment of Wheat Stripe Rust
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wheat stripe rust poses a marked threat to global wheat production. Accurate and effective disease severity assessments are crucial for disease resistance breeding and timely management of field diseases. In this study, we propose a practical solution using mobile-based deep learning and model-assisted labeling. StripeRust-Pocket, a user-friendly mobile application developed based on deep learning models, accurately quantifies disease severity in wheat stripe rust leaf images, even under complex backgrounds. Additionally, StripeRust-Pocket facilitates image acquisition, result storage, organization, and sharing. The underlying model employed by StripeRust-Pocket, called StripeRustNet, is a balanced lightweight 2-stage model. The first stage utilizes MobileNetV2-DeepLabV3+ for leaf segmentation, followed by ResNet50-DeepLabV3+ in the second stage for lesion segmentation. Disease severity is estimated by calculating the ratio of the lesion pixel area to the leaf pixel area. StripeRustNet achieves 98.65% mean intersection over union (MIoU) for leaf segmentation and 86.08% MIoU for lesion segmentation. Validation using an additional 100 field images demonstrated a mean correlation of over 0.964 with 3 expert visual scores. To address the challenges in manual labeling, we introduce a 2-stage labeling pipeline that combines model-assisted labeling, manual correction, and spatial complementarity. We apply this pipeline to our self-collected dataset, reducing the annotation time from 20 min to 3 min per image. Our method provides an efficient and practical solution for wheat stripe rust severity assessments, empowering wheat breeders and pathologists to implement timely disease management. It also demonstrates how to address the "last mile" challenge of applying computer vision technology to plant phenomics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".