A seasonal study on the microbiomes of Diploid vs. Triploid eastern oysters and their denitrification potential
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Oyster reefs are hotspots of denitrification mediated removal of dissolved nitrogen (N), however, information on their denitrifier microbiota is scarce. Furthermore, in oyster aquaculture, triploids are often preferred over diploids, yet again, microbiome differences between oyster ploidies are unknown. To address these knowledge gaps, farmed diploid and triploid oysters were collected over an annual growth cycle and analyzed using shotgun metagenomics and quantitative microbial elemental cycling (QMEC) techniques. Regardless of ploidy, Psychrobacter genus was abundant, with positive correlations found for genes of central metabolism, DNA metabolism, and carbohydrate metabolism. MAGs (metagenome-assembled genomes) yielded multiple Psychrobacter genomes harboring norB, narH, narI, and nirK denitrification genes, indicating their functional relevance within the eastern oysters. QMEC analysis indicated the predominance of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycling genes, with no discernable patterns between ploidies. Among the N-cycling genes, the nosZII clade was overrepresented, suggesting its role in the eastern oyster's N removal processes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".