MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399383120 · doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2024.05.028

Three-Decade Experience With Management of Coronary Artery Fistulas in Children

2024· article· en· W4399383120 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Raymond N. Haddad, Damien Bonnet, Sophie Malekzadeh-Milani

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Cardiology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoronary Artery Anomalies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineArteryInternal medicineCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BackgroundTreatment approach of coronary artery fistulas (CAFs) is debatable and long-term outcomes are unknown.MethodsRetrospective institutional data review of children in whom echocardiographically suspected CAFs were confirmed during cardiac catheterization from 1997-to-2023. Treatment approach and outcomes were assessed.ResultsWe identified 94 CAFs in 78 patients (42.3% males), median age of 3.4 years (IQR, 0.9-6.6). 25 (32%) patients had other congenital anomalies. 41/52 (78.8%) patients with isolated CAFs were asymptomatic. Most common site of CAF origin and drainage was the left system (62.8%) and right cardiac cavities (80.8%). Overall median follow-up was 101 months (IQR, 41-185). 23 (29.5%) patients with 35 (37.2%) small or non-shunting CAFs had conservative management and 20/23 (87%) patients had an uneventful follow-up. 8 (10.2%) patients with 9 (9.6%) complex CAFs were directly sent for surgery. One had early surgical patch failure needing surgical reintervention. 47 (60.3%) patients had catheter closure of 50 (53.2%) medium or large-sized CAFs using coils (30%), vascular plugs (20%), Nitinol duct occluders (40%), or material combination (10%). Six serious complications occurred. 2/3 patients with unsuccessful catheter procedures had subsequent surgeries. 2/3 patients with mild shunts had successful redo closures. One asymptomatic patient had recanalization after 12 years and is under watchful observation.ConclusionsCAFs have various anatomies and clinical presentations. Transcatheter closure is effective in carefully selected patients but is not complication-free. Surgery is a valuable upfront option in complex CAFs or bailout of unsuccessful transcatheter closures even though not frequently used. Treatment approach of coronary artery fistulas (CAFs) is debatable and long-term outcomes are unknown. Retrospective institutional data review of children in whom echocardiographically suspected CAFs were confirmed during cardiac catheterization from 1997-to-2023. Treatment approach and outcomes were assessed. We identified 94 CAFs in 78 patients (42.3% males), median age of 3.4 years (IQR, 0.9-6.6). 25 (32%) patients had other congenital anomalies. 41/52 (78.8%) patients with isolated CAFs were asymptomatic. Most common site of CAF origin and drainage was the left system (62.8%) and right cardiac cavities (80.8%). Overall median follow-up was 101 months (IQR, 41-185). 23 (29.5%) patients with 35 (37.2%) small or non-shunting CAFs had conservative management and 20/23 (87%) patients had an uneventful follow-up. 8 (10.2%) patients with 9 (9.6%) complex CAFs were directly sent for surgery. One had early surgical patch failure needing surgical reintervention. 47 (60.3%) patients had catheter closure of 50 (53.2%) medium or large-sized CAFs using coils (30%), vascular plugs (20%), Nitinol duct occluders (40%), or material combination (10%). Six serious complications occurred. 2/3 patients with unsuccessful catheter procedures had subsequent surgeries. 2/3 patients with mild shunts had successful redo closures. One asymptomatic patient had recanalization after 12 years and is under watchful observation. CAFs have various anatomies and clinical presentations. Transcatheter closure is effective in carefully selected patients but is not complication-free. Surgery is a valuable upfront option in complex CAFs or bailout of unsuccessful transcatheter closures even though not frequently used.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.337

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of CardiologySame topicCoronary Artery AnomaliesFrench-language works237,207