Three-Decade Experience With Management of Coronary Artery Fistulas in Children
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The treatment approach for coronary artery fistulas (CAFs) is debatable, and long-term outcomes are unknown. METHODS: This was a retrospective institutional data review of children in whom echocardiographically suspected CAFs were confirmed during cardiac catheterisation from 1997 to 2023. Treatment approach and outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: We identified 94 CAFs in 78 patients (42.3% male), median age 3.4 years (interquartile range [IQR] 0.9-6.6 y). Twenty-five patients (32%) had other congenital anomalies; 41 (78.8%) of the 52 patients with isolated CAFs were asymptomatic. The most common site of CAF origin and drainage was the left system (62.8%) and right cardiac cavities (80.8%). Overall median follow-up was 101 months (IQR 41-185 mo); 23 patients (29.5%) with 35 (37.2%) small or nonshunting CAFs had conservative management, and 20 (87%) of those 23 patients had an uneventful follow-up; 8 patients (10.2%) with 9 (9.6%) complex CAFs were directly sent for surgery; 1 patient had early surgical patch failure needing surgical reintervention; 47 patients (60.3%) had catheter closure of 50 (53.2%) medium- or large-sized CAFs with the use of coils (30%), vascular plugs (20%), nitinol duct occluders (40%), or material combination (10%). Six serious complications occurred. Two of the 3 patients with unsuccessful catheter procedures had subsequent surgeries. Two of the 3 patients with mild shunts had successful redo closures. One asymptomatic patient had recanalisation after 12 years and is under watchful observation. CONCLUSIONS: CAFs have various anatomies and clinical presentations. Transcatheter closure is effective in carefully selected patients but is not complication free. Surgery is a valuable up-front option in complex CAFs or bailout of unsuccessful transcatheter closures, although it is not frequently used.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".